Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Chhattisgarh High Court Case Commentaries

Section 69A Applies in the Year of Ownership, Not Deposit: Closing Cash-in-Hand of a Preceding Year Cannot Be Taxed as Unexplained in the Succeeding Year (Nanakchand Agrawal v. ITO, 2025)

Section 69A Applies in the Year of Ownership, Not Deposit: Closing Cash-in-Hand of a Preceding Year Cannot Be Taxed as Unexplained in the Succeeding Year (Nanakchand Agrawal v. ITO, 2025)

Date: Sep 4, 2025
Section 69A Applies in the Year of Ownership, Not Deposit: Closing Cash-in-Hand of a Preceding Year Cannot Be Taxed as Unexplained in the Succeeding Year Case: Nanakchand Agrawal v. The Income Tax...
“Silent Desertion” as Conclusive Proof of Animus Deserendi: A Commentary on Anil Kumar Sonmani v. Shradha Tiwari (2025)

“Silent Desertion” as Conclusive Proof of Animus Deserendi: A Commentary on Anil Kumar Sonmani v. Shradha Tiwari (2025)

Date: Aug 19, 2025
“Silent Desertion” as Conclusive Proof of Animus Deserendi A Detailed Commentary on Anil Kumar Sonmani @ Anil Swami v. Smt. Shradha Tiwari (2025 CGHC 41430-DB) 1. Introduction In August 2025, the...
Prospective Operation of Explanation 1(d) to Rule 43 CGST Rules & Denial of ITC on Electricity Supplied to Residential Townships – A Commentary on Bharat Aluminium Company Ltd. v. State of Chhattisgarh (2025)

Prospective Operation of Explanation 1(d) to Rule 43 CGST Rules & Denial of ITC on Electricity Supplied to Residential Townships – A Commentary on Bharat Aluminium Company Ltd. v. State of Chhattisgarh (2025)

Date: Aug 7, 2025
Prospective Operation of Explanation 1(d) to Rule 43 CGST Rules & Denial of ITC on Electricity Supplied to Residential Townships – A Commentary on Bharat Aluminium Company Ltd. v. State of...
“Proximate-Trigger Liability” for Custodial Deaths – Commentary on PREMA HATHTHEL v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH (2025 CGHC 23811-DB)

“Proximate-Trigger Liability” for Custodial Deaths – Commentary on PREMA HATHTHEL v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH (2025 CGHC 23811-DB)

Date: Jun 20, 2025
“Proximate-Trigger Liability” for Custodial Deaths Commentary on Prema Haththel v. State of Chhattisgarh (2025 CGHC 23811-DB) 1. Introduction The Chhattisgarh High Court’s division bench decision in...
Chhattarpal Sahu v. State of Chhattisgarh — The “Substantial-Compliance / No-Prejudice” Doctrine Re-affirmed in Departmental Enquiries

Chhattarpal Sahu v. State of Chhattisgarh — The “Substantial-Compliance / No-Prejudice” Doctrine Re-affirmed in Departmental Enquiries

Date: Jun 20, 2025
Chhattarpal Sahu v. State of Chhattisgarh (2025) — Re-affirmation of the “Substantial-Compliance / No-Prejudice” Doctrine in Departmental Enquiries 1. Introduction The Division Bench of the...
Judicial Discretion and Limitations on Re-Cross-Examination under Section 348 BNSS

Judicial Discretion and Limitations on Re-Cross-Examination under Section 348 BNSS

Date: Apr 24, 2025
Judicial Discretion and Limitations on Re-Cross-Examination under Section 348 BNSS Introduction This commentary examines the Chhattisgarh High Court’s decision in ABC v. Anil Kumar (2025:CGHC:17987),...
No Back‑Wages for Government Servants Convicted and Later Acquitted: Clarifying Rule 54‑B Applicability

No Back‑Wages for Government Servants Convicted and Later Acquitted: Clarifying Rule 54‑B Applicability

Date: Apr 19, 2025
No Back‑Wages for Government Servants Convicted and Later Acquitted: Clarifying Rule 54‑B Applicability Introduction The case of Ram Prasad Nayak v. State of Chhattisgarh (2025:CGHC:17141) arose out...
Ensuring Conclusive Corroboration in Circumstantial Cases: The Kavilas Precedent

Ensuring Conclusive Corroboration in Circumstantial Cases: The Kavilas Precedent

Date: Apr 15, 2025
Ensuring Conclusive Corroboration in Circumstantial Cases: The Kavilas Precedent Introduction The case of Kavilas v. State of Chhattisgarh presents a significant judicial determination where the...
Feeding Mistakes and Penalty Immunity: Bona Fide Data‐Entry Errors vs. Section 271(1)(c) Sanctions

Feeding Mistakes and Penalty Immunity: Bona Fide Data‐Entry Errors vs. Section 271(1)(c) Sanctions

Date: Apr 10, 2025
Feeding Mistakes and Penalty Immunity: Bona Fide Data‐Entry Errors vs. Section 271(1)(c) Sanctions Introduction This commentary examines the Chhattisgarh High Court’s decision in Chhattisgarh State...
Immediacy and Indigence as Essential Criteria for Compassionate Appointments

Immediacy and Indigence as Essential Criteria for Compassionate Appointments

Date: Apr 4, 2025
Immediacy and Indigence as Essential Criteria for Compassionate Appointments Introduction The decision in Smt. Dukhiya Bai v. Punjab National Bank (2025: CGHC: 15605‑DB) clarifies the scope of...
Principles Governing Bona Fide PILs: Distinguishing Public Interest from Private Agendas

Principles Governing Bona Fide PILs: Distinguishing Public Interest from Private Agendas

Date: Apr 3, 2025
Principles Governing Bona Fide PILs: Distinguishing Public Interest from Private Agendas Introduction This commentary examines the Chhattisgarh High Court’s decision in Bilaspur Lokhit Sanskritik...
New Precedent: Judicial Restraint in Technical Evaluation of Competitive Examinations

New Precedent: Judicial Restraint in Technical Evaluation of Competitive Examinations

Date: Apr 2, 2025
New Precedent: Judicial Restraint in Technical Evaluation of Competitive Examinations 1. Introduction Shubham Sinha v. The Hon’ble High Court of Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur (2025: CGHC:15226‑DB) is a...
Ensuring Proportionality in Disciplinary Punishment: Mandatory Consideration of Police Regulations 226(iii) & (iv) for Constables

Ensuring Proportionality in Disciplinary Punishment: Mandatory Consideration of Police Regulations 226(iii) & (iv) for Constables

Date: Mar 12, 2025
Ensuring Proportionality in Disciplinary Punishment: Mandatory Consideration of Police Regulations 226(iii) & (iv) for Constables Introduction This judgment arises from an intra‐Court appeal by...
Retrospective Termination in Fuel Supply Agreements: Limits of Judicial Intervention in Contractual Disputes

Retrospective Termination in Fuel Supply Agreements: Limits of Judicial Intervention in Contractual Disputes

Date: Jan 16, 2025
Retrospective Termination in Fuel Supply Agreements: Limits of Judicial Intervention in Contractual Disputes Introduction This commentary analyzes the recent judgment in the matter of "Sutlej...
Gratuity Recovery and Misappropriation Allegations: A Landmark Precedent in Balancing Public Exchequer Recovery and Retiree Rights

Gratuity Recovery and Misappropriation Allegations: A Landmark Precedent in Balancing Public Exchequer Recovery and Retiree Rights

Date: Jan 15, 2025
Gratuity Recovery and Misappropriation Allegations: A Landmark Precedent in Balancing Public Exchequer Recovery and Retiree Rights Introduction This Judgment in the matter of STATE OF CHHATTISGARH v....
Reinforcing Designated Burial Grounds Under Panchayat Rules: The New Chhattisgarh High Court Directive

Reinforcing Designated Burial Grounds Under Panchayat Rules: The New Chhattisgarh High Court Directive

Date: Jan 10, 2025
Reinforcing Designated Burial Grounds Under Panchayat Rules: The New Chhattisgarh High Court Directive 1. Introduction The case of RAMESH BAGHEL v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH, decided by the Chhattisgarh...
“Stigmatic Termination of Contractual Employees Requires Prior Inquiry”: New Principle from the Chhattisgarh High Court

“Stigmatic Termination of Contractual Employees Requires Prior Inquiry”: New Principle from the Chhattisgarh High Court

Date: Jan 4, 2025
“Stigmatic Termination of Contractual Employees Requires Prior Inquiry”: New Principle from the Chhattisgarh High Court 1. Introduction The recent Judgment in Yaad Das Sahu v. State of Chhattisgarh...
NCVT Salary Payment Guidelines Declared Directory: A Landmark Clarification by Chhattisgarh High Court

NCVT Salary Payment Guidelines Declared Directory: A Landmark Clarification by Chhattisgarh High Court

Date: Dec 11, 2024
NCVT Salary Payment Guidelines Declared Directory: A Landmark Clarification by Chhattisgarh High Court 1. Introduction The case of Abhishek Bhaskar v. State of Chhattisgarh arises from a recruitment...
Strict Enforcement of Review Limitations under CPC: Chhattisgarh High Court’s New Directive

Strict Enforcement of Review Limitations under CPC: Chhattisgarh High Court’s New Directive

Date: Dec 4, 2024
Strict Enforcement of Review Limitations under CPC: Chhattisgarh High Court’s New Directive 1. Introduction The Judgment under discussion is STATE OF CHHATTISGARH v. KU. KIRTI KUMARI KANWAR,...
Establishing Standards for Mental Cruelty in Matrimonial Dissolution: Gora Pallai Venkatgiri v. Smt. Yernakula Meera

Establishing Standards for Mental Cruelty in Matrimonial Dissolution: Gora Pallai Venkatgiri v. Smt. Yernakula Meera

Date: Nov 6, 2024
Establishing Standards for Mental Cruelty in Matrimonial Dissolution: Gora Pallai Venkatgiri v. Smt. Yernakula Meera Introduction The case of Gora Pallai Venkatgiri v. Smt. Yernakula Meera was...
Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert